Topical Category
1999 Watchman's Trumpet
From Past Issues of FOUNDATION Magazine

"For other FOUNDATION can no man lay that is laid, which is JESUS CHRIST"  1 Corinthians 3:11

Navigation

Home
Audio Tapes
The Blood of Jesus
Creation Essay Index
Doctrinal Statement
Editorials
Feature Bible Studies
Foundation Magazine
News and Views
Order Form
Radio Broadcasts-Audio
Radio Broadcast Schedule
Table of Contents
Tracts & Literature On-Line
Watchman's Trumpet

 

Fundamental Evangelistic Association


[WORLD AND NATIONAL RELIGIOUS NEWS VIEWED FROM A BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVE - This information is intended to inform Bible-believing Christians of important current events which affect the Church, the nation and the world. All comments and questions regarding these articles should be directed to the Editor, FOUNDATION magazine, 1476 W. Herndon, Suite 104, Los Osos, California 93412. FOUNDATION is published monthly by the Fundamental Evangelistic Association in Los Osos, CA. It is free to those who regularly support the FEA ministry. Articles appearing in "NEWS and VIEWS" may be reprinted with proper credit given.]


Fundamental Evangelistic Association
1476 W. Herndon, Suite 104
Fresno, California 93711 U.S.A.
Telephone 559-438-0080, Fax 559-438-0089

 

 

Fundamental Evangelistic Association

Watchman's Trumpet - 1999
©FOUNDATION
A MAGAZINE OF BIBLICAL FUNDAMENTALISM

Dennis W.Costella, Editor; Karel Beyer, Production Manager; Matt Costella, Copy Editor
M.H. Reynolds, Jr. (1919-1997), Founding Editor


Index of Articles

Foundation Magazine : Current and Past Issues

1997 Watchman's Trumpet Index
1998 Watchman's Trumpet Index
2000 Watchman's Trumpet Index

Foundation Magazine : Jan - Feb 1999

Amazing Statements From Today's Religious Leaders
United Church of Christ Reaffirms Commitment to Gay, Lesbian and Bi-Sexual Members and Ministers
New Interfaith Books for Children Published to Equip "Tomorrow's Peacemakers"

Foundation Magazine : Mar - Apr 1999

Coming to Christ Through Visions, Dreams and Miracles
Consultation on Church Union (COCU) Seeks New Vision for Ecumenical Cooperation
Humanism - Man Without God
Interfaith Roads Leading to Rome

Foundation Magazine : May - June 1999

Jesse Jackson's Social Gospel Rejects Work of Christ as Sufficient for Salvation
"National Day of Prayer" Involves Right Idea, Wrong Message of Cooperation
New Edition of the RSV to be Edited and Embraced by Evangelical and Charismatic Theologians
New  NAE President to Replace "Block Walls" with "Picket Fences"
Toronto "Revival" Now Boasts "Dental Miracles" from God
Vatican Continues to Strive for Unity with Muslims and Protestants
Was the Apostle Paul Prejudiced or Inspired?
What's Wrong with the Alpha Course?
24- Hour Catholic Radio Network Reaches Out to Catholics and Non-Catholics Alike

Foundation Magazine : July - August 1999

Anglican, Vatican Commission Agree on "Gift" of Papal Authority
Baptist World Alliance, Anglican Church to Begin Four-Year Talks
Campolo Defends Clinton's "Gay Pride" Decision, Embraces Universalist Theology
Clinton Appoints First Openly Homosexual U.S. Ambassador
Graham Calls Christian Rock His "Interpreter" to Today's Youth

SBC Still No Place for a Fundamentalist
Vatican, Lutherans to Sign Joint Declaration
Vatican, Orthodox Church Strive for Closer Cooperation, Reconciliation

Foundation Magazine : September-October 1999

BWA General Secretary Calls For New Attitude Toward Charismatic Movement
Former SBC President Dialogues With Homosexual Denomination
Hinn’s New Book Details Life, Influence Of Kathryn Kuhlman
Lutherans Agree To Enter Into Full Communion With Episcopal Church
New Platform For Ecumenical Unity Established By Campus Crusade, SBC
Pope John Paul II Rejects Reality Of A Literal Hell
Trinity Broadcasting Network’s Compromise Reaps Financial Harvest

Foundation Magazine : November-December 1999

Campolo Reaffirms Belief In Universalist Theology, Cites Graham To Support His Position
Canadian Churches Forge Unprecedented Unity In Celebration Of New Millennium
Catholics and Lutherans Close Door on Reformation, Sign Joint Declaration
Graham Encourages Ecumenism, Shuns Responsibility To Distinguish Truth From Error
Pope Calls Increased Dialogue Among World Religions A "Sign Of Hope" At End Of Century

AMAZING STATEMENTS FROM AMAZING STATEMENTS FROM TODAY'S RELIGIOUS LEADERS

     Two recent interviews on CNN's "Larry King Live" television broadcast once again reveal just how far two of today's most respected Christian leaders have, in fact, departed from the orthodox teaching of Scripture. The majority of professing Christendom today laud Billy Graham and Robert Schuller, but a careful took at their fellowships and their public teachings requires any discerning believer not only to reject the false doctrine they propagate but also to lovingly warn others of their error.
     The December 19, 1998, broadcast of "Larry King Live Weekend" featured a panel of United States senators who discussed the implications of the House of Representatives' impeachment vote against President Clinton. Toward the end of the broadcast, King interviewed Robert Schuller, asking him if this was a time for national prayer (italics added):

SCHULLER: You know, it surely is. I think it's probably providential that this comes at just the day before Larry King is going to be Robert Schuller's guest and you will offer your first public prayer in the Crystal Cathedral.

KING: What does the nation do with something like this? What would you say to people? It's a sad day.

SCHULLER: It's a sad day, and people are hurting, and they're hurting on all sides. What does this mean? A hurt internally is an indication that we have spiritual needs that we're not totally personally adequate to handle all alone, which means we all need God. We have to find God in our own way. God lives in people.

KING: But Democrats say they believe in God and Republicans say they believe in God... and they're angry, and people are being hurt and we're meddling into lives.

SCHULLER: Which means we need-we need Ramadan. We need Christmas. We need Hanukkah. This is the time of the year when all human beings should realize, leave us alone into our whims and fantasies and prejudices and hatreds and insecurities and fears and prejudices and we can be very mean people. People can be real mean. This is the time to come clean and be kind and civil.

     King proceeded to ask Schuller what advice he would give to the Democratic Senators and others who are angry about the impeachment of President Clinton:

SCHULLER: I'd say to them, go to your knees and try prayer. I think that when Larry King writes a book called Powerful Prayers, as you did - and I'm so proud to have my name as a foreword to it When you call people to look at prayer, that's what we need - in your own way.

     The idea that people need to "find God in their own way" because "God lives in people" is completely contrary to Scripture. Schuller's universalistic theology, while popular today among the majority of liberal churches and even many evangelical churches, is an abomination to God and is a false gospel. The Word of God teaches that all men are sinners and in rebellion against God, and that Jesus Christ is "the way, the truth and the life." It is also sad that Schuller promotes King's latest book on prayer, for King is a self-professed agnostic.
     In another CNN "Larry King Live" interview, King interviewed Dr. Billy Graham for a full hour on Christmas day. During the course of the interview, King questioned Graham about the afterlife soon after Graham had mentioned he was not afraid to die since he knew he would be with God (italics added):

GRAHAM: I'll know Him. He'll know me. He will receive me. I believe the moment that I die, an angel comes and takes my hand and leads me into His presence.

KING: In your body or through a soul?

GRAHAM: Both-maybe both, because we have been resurrected. Remember, this body's coming back together again. Nothing ever disappears ...

KING: All right. You'll meet Jesus and then what will it be like? What will paradise be like?

GRAHAM: It's going to be like paradise. It'll be the - everything that you ever wanted for happiness will be there. People say that the Bible teaches there's no sex in Heaven. If sex is necessary for our happiness and fulfillment, it’ll be there. And then, if certain other things that we think are pleasurable will - it’ll be there.

     Once again, Graham's theology is completely contrary to Scripture. God's Word never teaches that whatever is necessary for physical human happiness will be the believer's lot in heaven. On the contrary, the believer will rejoice in praising God and fulfilling His will, not the desired will of the individual. The believer's physical body, while on the earth, is still wrestling with the lusts of the flesh and the pride of life that are certainly pleasurable to the earthly saint. But heaven will be a place where the believer will fulfill the will of the Savior and honor and glorify Him throughout all eternity. To give the impression that heaven will be a type of hedonistic paradise is dangerous, false theology.
     These statements are accurately reproduced in their proper context in order to warn the church of the dangerous doctrines that have infiltrated it. They are not intended to harm the reputation of either Dr. Graham or Dr. Schuller; however, when highly esteemed professed believers utter public statements that are contrary to Scripture, the church must not keep silent, but publicly respond to error. Public proclamation of error deserves the response of public proclamation of truth. The Bible exhorts believers to speak the truth in love and edify the church by teaching the Word and contending for the faith.

Return to Index

ANGLICAN, VATICAN COMMISSION AGREE ON "GIFT" OF PAPAL AUTHORITY

     The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) recently released an official statement called "The Gift of Authority" which addressed the issue of the primacy of the pope. The statement called the primacy of the pope a "gift to be received by all the churches." While this 18-member commission, appointed by both the Vatican and the Anglican Communion, cannot rule on whether or not to accept full papal authority, it can recommend that it be received. However, not all in the Anglican Communion, a collection of independent national churches that stem from the Church of England (such as the Episcopal Church in the United States and the Anglican Church of Canada) agree with the commission. According to a May 21, 1999, article in the Chicago Tribune, the Church of England Newspaper opposed such a willingness to grant papal authority on the grounds that Anglicans still are not allowed to receive the Eucharist in Catholic services nor are Anglican ordinations valid in the Vatican. Other concerns include Pope John Paul II's view of the Virgin Mary and the recent revival of indulgences. Dr. George Carey, Archbishop of Canterbury and Primate of the 70-million member Anglican Communion, knew the document would cause controversy but welcomed it nonetheless. In an Ecumenical News International (ENI) report dated May 18,1999, Carey said, "No doubt there will be several issues in "The Gift of Authority" which will be questioned, critically evaluated and examined by both communions ... but polemic theology has now been replaced by convergent theology. " In the same ENI report, Geoffrey Kirk, national secretary of the UK-based traditionalist Anglican group Forward in Faith said "the Anglican Communion desperately needs a unifying primacy, but its disunity [over women priests and homosexuality] is such that it couldn't receive it." Rev. Mark Santer, co-chairman of the commission and an Anglican bishop, stated that, in the end, the churches had not agreed on the pope's authority. "Rather," he said, "the commission is addressing itself to the conditions necessary for the restoration of communion between Christians. It believes that, if Christian people are to find that unity which is God's will, this will entail acceptance of a particular ministry for the maintenance of unity, to be exercised by the bishop of Rome" (Chicago Tribune, 5-21-99). Despite the problems that need to be addressed, both groups are striving for common ground on which to come together.

Return to Index

BAPTIST WORLD ALLIANCE, ANGLICAN CHURCH TO BEGIN FOUR-YEAR TALKS

      The Baptist World Alliance (BWA) and the Anglican Church will begin formal talks in the year 2000. The decision to begin the four-year consultations came on May 25 when BWA General Secretary Denton Lotz met with Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) General Secretary David Hamid and the Church of England General Secretary John Peterson in London, England. The July-August 1999 issue of the BWA News said the content of the upcoming dialogue between the BWA and Anglican church "will be the similarities and dissimilarities that exist between the two communities, major theological and polity issues and ways in which the two can cooperate in mission and community activities." A June 21, 1999, BWA news release stated, "These forthcoming talks with the Anglicans, or Episcopalians, continues a tradition of conversations with other Christian world communions and is part of the responsibility the BWA has to promote understanding, not only among Baptists, but among other Christian groups." Lotz said the BWA "looks forward to these significant conversations that will enable both communions to share what they have in common, and to learn from one another about those issues where we can both be mutually encouraging." Lotz continued, "It is our hope that these theological conversations will contribute to that unity for which Christ prayed in John 17, to the end that the world might find it easier to believe." Of course, the unity for which Christ prayed in John 17 is spiritual unity with the Father that one receives the moment he becomes a child of God. Unity with those who preach a false gospel is never acceptable to the Lord. It is sad how this prayer of Jesus as recorded in John 17 is so often misapplied and perverted in an attempt to forge unbiblical, ecumenical unity.

Return to Index

BAPTIST WORLD ALLIANCE GENERAL SECRETARY CALLS FOR NEW ATTITUDE TOWARD CHARISMATIC MOVEMENT

During an address at Prague's International Baptist Theological Seminary, Baptist World Alliance (BWA) General Secretary Denton Lotz urged Baptists to change their attitudes about the Charismatic Movement. Lotz's address at the seminary's 50th anniversary celebration in the Czech Republic centered on the theme "Reform in Theological Education." During the address, Lotz told Baptists that they needed to change their view of the modem Charismatic Movement. According to the Baptist Press, "Lotz said the sheer number of Christians classified as charismatic, more than 500 million, should stir attention among Baptists" (BP, 8-12-99). He urged Baptists to refrain from an attitude of "ambivalence" toward the Charismatic Movement. "We need to get over our hang-up of the use of the word of 'charismatic' and deal with the content of the matter, " he said. "The fact is, it was a rediscovery of the power and work of the Holy Spirit that brought this movement into being, whatever its name. Therefore Baptist theologians and students need to take seriously the work of the Holy Spirit." Lotz's two reasons for calling on Baptists to begin to accept the Charismatic Movement (its size and its "rediscovery" of the work of the Holy Spirit) are Scripturally unsound, theologically deficient and somewhat surprising, coming from one who exhorted Baptists elsewhere in his address to place a greater emphasis on theological study and Biblical exegesis. The BWA is but one more organization striving to not only build bridges with Charismatics but to also embrace Charismatic heresies. Earlier in the year, National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) President Kevin Mannoia, a self-described Charismatic, announced that he would continue to build bridges with Charismatics and those within mainline denominations. Likewise, the World Council of Churches (WCC) is seeking to initiate a new Forum, called the "Common Understanding and Vision" (CUV), that would bring together Pentecostal/Charismatics, Evangelicals, Roman Catholics and others not currently associated with the WCC.

Return to Index

CAMPOLO DEFENDS CLINTON’S "GAY PRIDE" DECISION, EMBRACES UNIVERSALIST THEOLOGY

      Tony Campolo, spiritual advisor to President Clinton, defended Clinton's decision to declare June as "Gay Pride Month" and affirmed his belief in a universalist theology on a recent CNN Crossfire program. The June 15, 1999, Crossfire broadcast featured a debate between Jerry Falwell and Tony Campolo on various political and theological issues. When asked by Falwell what he thinks about the president's decision to declare June as "Gay Pride Month," Campolo said, "It's a pluralistic society, and I think that he is endeavoring to affirm people" He continued to defend Clinton's decision and concluded by adding, "Love requires justice and acceptance." Later in the broadcast, co-host Bill Press (who said the idea that "Jesus is the only way to heaven" is "really wrong") asked Falwell whether Jesus Christ was the only way to heaven or whether those of other religions who had lived exemplary lives would also be able to enter the kingdom of heaven. While Falwell correctly answered that only those who trust in Jesus Christ would receive salvation, Campolo responded by saying, "We need to hold Christ up as the Savior, but I think we need to leave judgment in the hands of God." Falwell then asked Campolo, "Do you believe anyone has ever gone to heaven apart from Christ, yes or no?" Campolo responded, "I go with the Scriptures." After refusing to answer Falwell's question with a simple yes or no, Campolo, who claims to be an evangelical Christian, eventually responded by saying, "The apostle Paul says that there are people who have light that is not Christian light, and they will be judged on that basis." Such a statement is a blasphemous denial of the necessity of the death and resurrection of Christ and of the necessity for all to hear the Gospel message. God's Word declares that no individual apart from salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ alone can be justified in the sight of God (Rom. 5:1-21).

Return to Index

CAMPOLO REAFFIRMS BELIEF IN UNIVERSALIST THEOLOGY, CITES GRAHAM TO SUPPORT HIS POSITION

      In an open letter to Jerry Falwell and the readers of Falwell's September 1999 Liberty Journa1, Tony Campolo, an "evangelical" theologian and professor at the American Baptist affiliated Eastern College, reaffirmed his belief in universalism (the idea that some can be saved without personally hearing about and believing in Jesus Christ). Falwell had challenged Campolo's recent statements on a CNN Crossfire broadcast in which Campolo stated, after refusing to clearly answer whether or not he believed Jesus is the only way to heaven, "The apostle Paul says that there are people who have light that is not Christian light, and they will be judged on that basis" (see report in July-August 1999 Foundation magazine). Falwell criticized Campolo for this statement, and Campolo's open letter to Falwell and his readers only serves to reaffirm Campolo's aforementioned belief in universalism.
      Within the letter, Campolo said that while he does believe Jesus is the "one and only Savior of humanity," he also believes that Romans 2:14-16 "suggests that the work of Christ on the cross may be broader than some of us think." He continued,

Billy Graham has said that on Judgment Day, there may be people who enter the Kingdom who have not called themselves Christians. I believe that if such people are saved, it is because of what Jesus did on Calvary . On the Charlie Rose show, I said that I am not convinced that Jesus only lives in Christians. I stand by that statement. I myself have encountered many people who believe in and follow the Jesus of the New Testament, but who feel unable to call themselves Christians because they do not identify themselves with the sold-out Jesus of America's cultural Christian establishment.

      While Campolo attempts to waffle around his previous statements made on CNN's Crossfire broadcast by claiming that his original remarks referred only to some individuals who believe in the Jesus of the New Testament but refuse to embrace the name "Christian," it is evident from his statements that he believes, like Graham, that those "who have light other than Christian light" will go to heaven one day. Yet the Word of God declares that Jesus Christ is the only "Christian light," and any other light" cannot and will not save anyone. Those who have never heard the Gospel and believed in Jesus Christ will die in their sins. Believers must reach out through missions and personal witness to the lost and reject any doctrine that teaches salvation can be obtained apart from the hearing and understanding of the Gospel message.

Return to Index

CANADIAN CHURCHES FORGE UNPRECEDENTED UNITY IN CELEBRATION OF NEW MILLENNIUM

      The Canadian Council of Churches (CCC) and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC) have joined together in an unprecedented ecumenical union to sponsor a new project titled "Together 2000: Christians in Canada Honouring Jesus." According to the Together 2000 mission statement, "The purpose of Together 2000 is to inspire Christians in Canada to honour Jesus together-reaching across historical barriers through shared worship, prayer, carol singing and acts of compassion ." This is the first time in history that the two organizations, which represent a combined 50+ denominations in Canada, have cosponsored a project. An October 4, 1999, Ecumenical News International (ENI) report noted that "the project is significant because historically there has been a tendency for evangelical Christians and those involved in ecumenical organisations to regard each other with suspicion." While the CCC (a member of the World Council of Churches) includes most mainline Protestant, Orthodox, Anglican and Roman Catholic churches in Canada, the EFC consists of 32 Evangelical denominations in addition to 1,000 local congregations and other Christian organizations. A sampling of the EFC constituency includes the Association of Vineyard Churches in Canada, the Baptist General Conference of Canada, the Church of the Nazarene Canada, Evangelical Free Church of Canada, Foursquare Gospel Church of Canada, Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, Worldwide Church of God and many other Evangelical and Charismatic churches and denominations.
      Gary Walsh, president of the EFC, and Janet Somerville, general secretary of the CCC, co-chair the Together 2000 project. According to a March 1999 Together 2000 press release, Walsh and Somerville have established a joint working group which "plans to publicize and encourage initiatives that will help Christians enter the new millennium with renewed hope grounded in the gospel of Jesus. "The press release states:

The new joint working group hopes to incite Christians all over Canada to reach across taken-for-granted boundaries . In learning bow to work together the joint committee members hear voices that speak in varied accents. Input comes from Anglican and Free Methodist sources, from Baptist and Eastern Orthodox and Pentecostal and Presbyterian traditions, from the Roman Catholic Church and from the United Church Of Canada, from independent congregations and from Christian Reformed and Lutheran participants

The press release quotes Walsh as asking, "Why wouldn't Canadian Christians want to reach out and kind of touch each others’ fingertips as they honour the One they all have in common." He adds, "I can't walk away from this. No evangelical can be against an effort to honour Jesus. And if God makes this grow, this can be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for a coast to coast celebration of faith."
      Events surrounding the project include, as noted, joint worship, prayer, carol singing and ads of compassion." According to ENI, Canadian churches will join in the "ringing of church bells, shared prayers on January 2, and encouraging churches to engage in 'new projects and acts of compassion."' Leaders of the project are asking churches to recommend other ways in which the churches can join together in celebration of the new millennium. The Together 2000 mission statement says, "You can help us by sending us news of Christian events planned to celebrate the millennium as an anniversary of Jesus’ birth-events that cross barriers of denomination, economics, culture, physical and mental disabilities-events that bring the followers of Jesus together in unusual and inclusive ways."'
      The idea of Together 2000 originated in August 1998 in the mind of Don Posterski, vice president of World Vision Canada. Somerville told ENI of Posterski, "He longed to see all the Christians in Canada doing something together to usher in the third millennium of Christianity." According to the project website, Posterski began to ask himself the following questions "How can followers of Jesus demonstrate Christian love in a country marked by fragmentation? How can we practice 'principled pluralism' by embracing our common faith commitments while still making room for our significant differences?" Posterski purposed to find a "shared Christian expression that would be interdenominational in spirit, evangelical in passion, pentecostal in enthusiasm, catholic and inclusive in scope, and respectful and neighbourly towards everyone." The CCC and EFC both decided that Posterski's "idea was timely, maybe even inspired." In response, they formed the aforementioned joint committee and appointed Carolyn Whitney-Brown, a Roman Catholic, as director of the Together 2000 project.
      The attitudes and actions of Walsh, Somerville, Posterski and Whitney-Brown epitomize the ecumenical spirit that is permeating Christendom today. Walsh even admitted in the January/February 1999 issue of Faith Today magazine that this ecumenical event involves "participating with others whose view of salvation is different." Yet he does not believe this constitutes doctrinal compromise. However, the Word of God says that any gospel other than the Good News of salvation by grace through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone is under God's curse (Gal. 1:6-10). It also commands the believer to "turn away" from and "avoid" those who teach any doctrine contrary to that which was delivered to the New Testament apostles and prophets, despite the fact that such individuals may have a "form of godliness" (Rom. 16 17, 2 Tim 3:1-5). No obedient believer should unite for prayer, worship or evangelism with any church or denomination that preaches false doctrine or refuses to separate from those who do.

Return to Index

CATHOLICS AND LUTHERANS CLOSE DOOR ON REFORMATION

      After nearly 500 years of division and 30 years of recent dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, leaders from both groups met in Augsburg, Germany, on October 31, 1999, to endorse the consensus in basic truths" they have reached regarding the doctrine of justification. The historical meeting occurred exactly 482 years to the day after Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the door of a Wittenburg cathedral, denouncing the Roman Catholic doctrine of justification, among other things, and spawning the Protestant Reformation. The "Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification" states that man is saved by the grace of God alone and that the mutual doctrinal condemnations that each church has leveled against the other are no longer valid. It is the first time in history that the Roman Catholic Church has signed a formal doctrinal agreement with a Protestant church. An Associated Press (AP) report said that Pope John Paul II, who approved the document, welcomed the agreement as a milestone along a difficult path full of joy, union, and communion among Christians" (AP 11-1-99). Bishop Christian Krause, president of the Lutheran World Federation (LWF), added, For the first time in centuries we are walking on common ground together." The Washington Post, noting "the [Joint Declaration] declares, in effect, that [Luther's protest in 1517] as all a misunderstanding," reported "that many said this accord gives added promise to the ideal their denominations champion-of full communion, or merger, between the churches" (Washington Post, 11-1-99)
      Yet, while the Joint Declaration is exclusively limited to an agreement between Lutherans and Catholics, ecumenical leaders from both churches hope that this event will lead to further unity among all denominations. Cardinal Edward Cassidy, the Vatican's senior ecumenical official and president of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, said, "The consensus reached with the Lutheran World Federation on basic truths of the doctrine of justification is of great significance, not only for the two parties directly involved, but also for the whole ecumenical movement…" (Vatican News Bulletin, 10-29-99). In his sermon at Augsburg during the ceremony, Cassidy stated,

We have succeeded in bringing here today a document that takes forward in a significant way the work of restoration or unity among the followers of Christ. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification has brought new life and hope to the whole ecumenical movement as we come to the close of this second Christian millennium We must build on that hope…our divisions are a great impediment to that task. (ENI, 11-1-99)

      According to Ecumenical News International (ENI), Cassidy believes that the Joint Declaration "could provide a model for other ecumenical agreements" (ENI, 11-1-99). Cassidy admitted that while other issues such as abortion and the ordination of homosexuals have divided churches, especially in the United States, he said these issues are not quite the same as doctrinal questions that go to the heart of future relationships." George Anderson, presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and vice president of the LWF, agrees with Cassidy. Anderson signed the Joint Declaration and, according to a Religion Today report, believes this milestone will lead to other future agreements ("Lutherans and Catholics Sign Historic Agreement," 11-1-99). Pope John Paul II issued a statement from the Vatican on October31 in which he called the agreement a "milestone on the not always easy road towards the restoration of full unity between Christians" (ENI, 11-1-99). Likewise, LWF General Secretary Ishmael Noko related his thoughts to a press conference in Augsburg two days prior to the signing of the agreement:

By this joint declaration, the Roman Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation have removed a serious obstacle to further progress towards the visible unity in Christ to which we and the whole ecumenical movement aspire. It paves the way to further ecumenical dialogue on other issues between the Roman Catholic Church and the churches of the Reformation, and to closer cooperation in the wider ministry and witness. (ENI, 10-29-99)

      Opposition to the agreement arose from over 200 Lutheran theologians in Germany and from the Lutheran Church Missouri-Synod in the United States. Both groups maintain that the declaration fails to reveal any change in Roman Catholic teaching concerning justification and fails to define "grace." When asked whether Martin Luther was justified in protesting the Catholic Church and nailing his 95 Theses to the Wittenburg door, Cardinal Cassidy said, "What we have tried to do in the dialogue is not to pass judgment…but to ask what are Lutherans and Catholics able to say today" (ENI, 10-29-99). Reverend Joseph Komonchak, professor of theology at Catholic University in Washington, told the Washington Post, "'This Joint Declaration appears to be saying that the doctrine that Luther thought was central to the Reformation, and which led him to undertake it, is not one on which there are serious enough differences between Catholics and Lutherans to justify the division of the church" (Washington Post, 11-1-99). The LWF which signed the document with the Roman Catholic Church, represents 58 million of the world's 61.5 million Lutherans.

Return to Index

CLINTON APPOINTS FIRST OPENLY HOMOSEXUAL U.S. AMBASSADOR

        President Clinton recently bypassed the U. S. Senate and appointed homosexual activist James C. Hormel, who is, himself, a homosexual, as United States ambassador to Luxembourg. The appointment makes Hormel the first openly homosexual U. S. ambassador. Conservatives in the Senate had delayed Hormel's nomination for 18 months, but Clinton gave Hormel a "recess appointment" while the Senate was out of session in observance of Memorial Day. Hormel is known not only for helping to finance the objectives of the Democratic Party but also for financing major causes within the homosexual movement. For example, Hormel donated $500,000 to raise funds for the Gay and Lesbian Center in San Francisco's new Main Library. The self-proclaimed purpose of the Gay and Lesbian Center is to document lesbian and gay history and culture. In addition, Hormel also helped finance a video documentary promoting the teaching of homosexuality in the classroom. During the month of June, the documentary aired across the nation by public radio KQED in San Francisco and through American Public Television in light of " Gay Pride Month. " Hormel also supports the legalization of homosexual marriages and co-founded the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay advocacy group which lobbies Congress, contributes to political candidates, engages in political campaigns, sponsors the National Coming Out Project and opposes ex-gay ministries. Three years ago Hormel's nomination as U. S. ambassador to Fiji met quick defeat due to conservative opposition, but according to the San Francisco Chronicle, Hormel said he would have declined the position anyway since he discovered Fiji upholds a sodomy statute (S. F. Chronicle, 3-22-96). It is obvious that our nation's President is doing everything he can to promote sin and ungodliness.

Return to Index

COMING TO CHRIST THROUGH VISIONS, DREAMS AND MIRACLES

      Many reports are circulating from both Charismatic and non-charismatic missions ministries about Muslims, Hindus and individuals of other religions accepting Christ after experiencing visions, dreams or miracles. Numerous examples could be cited, but a few seem especially timely and relevant. For example, International Christian Concern leader Steve Snyder told one news service that in communist and Muslim dominated countries, many are coming to Christ through healings and visions. Citing Snyder's testimony, the November 17, 1997, Religion Today feature story entitled "Amazing Miracles Are Occurring in Muslim Countries" reported, "The church is experiencing great power, expressed in 'miraculous hearings and visions' that are bringing people to Christ. " Snyder told the Religion Today editors that. "Muslims are having dreams in which Jesus appears and proclaims to be the Savior."
      Another group making similar claims is Campus Crusade for Christ, sponsor of the Jesus Film Project (JFP). One JFP World Report (#26) recounted the conversion of a Hindu who followed the god Ayappa. After the Jesus film was shown in his village, he dreamed that Ayappa and many other idols stood in a circle "testifying with one voice that Jesus Christ alone is the true God." That night, the man and his family reportedly turned to Christ after seeing the vision. Another JFP World Report (#28) details the events that unfolded at a showing of the Jesus film in Malawi. The report says a Muslim prayed and received Christ at the viewing: "He let out a loud scream, laughed and wept as he was freed from evil spirits. Another Muslim man who indicated receiving Christ was healed of deafness, while a woman experienced instant healing from malaria."
      The following news report issued in the January 15, 1999, Religion Today news summary, originally released by the DAWN Fridayfax weekly news service, highlights the "conversion experience" of another man:

An Iranian man became a Christian because of a d ream. He told a Christian worker that he saw himself in a dream standing on the roof of his house, bathed in a bright light. "The light then moved down to illuminate a stream, which seemed to be made of light. I have consulted books and visited dream interpreters, but I can find no answer," he said. His friend told him Jesus is the light of the world, that the light was Jesus calling him to be saved, and the stream indicated he should be baptized. The man believed the interpretation, prayed to Jesus, and asked to be baptized.

      The report concluded, "Many Muslims who have never heard the gospel are becoming Christians through dreams, Campus Crusade for Christ said. "
      Finally, consider the claims of the January 1999 JFP newsletter: That an unsaved girl from the Malto tribe, which had previously resisted the advance of the Jesus Film Project team, died, "went to the place of the dead," and came back to life after seeing God. The girl said, "God has given me seven days to tell as many people as I can that He is real." After seven days, the girl reportedly died again. Paul Eshleman, director of the Jesus Film Project, related this story in the JFP newsletter and called it a miracle because he claims: 1) He checked the facts carefully, 2) The "miracle" glorifies Jesus and 3) The fruit produced from this event has resulted in new churches being planted and individuals coming to Christ. Therefore, according to Eshleman, this miracle involving an unsaved girl rising from the dead and being told by God to tell others about Jesus is truly of God.
      The credibility of this last report cannot be substantiated, but even if there were some form of "supernatural manifestation" or extra-biblical revelation seeming to authenticate the message and messenger, it does not mean this "miracle" was of the Lord. Notice in Acts 16:16-18 that a false, demonic spirit caused a damsel to declare truth regarding the apostle. Furthermore, 2 Thessalonians 2:8-10 and Revelation 13:11-14, two of many other such texts, warn the saints that in the last days before the Lord returns to the earth miraculous displays will be used to deceive. Surely these last days of the Church Age are conditioning the world to accept and expect the miraculous and to assume that it is all of God. No, the Bible alone authenticates the message and the ministry. The Lord has spoken in these last days by His Son (Heb. 1:1, 2), and all that we know concerning Christ is in the completed canon of Scripture alone. We know this is true because Christ prophesied that His disciples and holy prophets (the inspired writers of the New Testament) would be guided "into all truth" (Jn. 16:12-15 cf. Jude 3, 17-20; Eph. 2:19-3:5; 2 Pet. 3:1-4; 14-16; 1 Cor. 14:37).

Return to Index

CONSULTATION ON CHURCH UNION (COCU) SEEKS NEW VISION FOR ECUMENICAL COOPERATION

     After 39 years of ecumenical struggle, representatives of nine U. S. Protestant denominations have agreed to form a "new relationship" between member communions by 2002. The Consultation on Church Union (COCU), a 39-year old unity dialogue inspired by Eugene Carson Blake and Bishop James K. Pike, held its 18th Plenary in St. Louis, Missouri, just days before the pope was scheduled to arrive in St. Louis. During the five-day meeting, the delegates approved a document that calls for the nine denominations to unite into a new relationship called "Churches Uniting in Christ" during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity in 2002. Now, each denomination must officially approve the measure. While this new union would not form a new denomination, each church of the member denominations would be in "full communion" with one another. Any member communions that feel as though they will not be able to become an official, visible part of the Churches Uniting in Christ "would be invited to be partners in continuing relationship."
     The approved document outlines the nine "marks" that each denomination would accept if it decides to join the Churches Uniting in Christ. Of the nine marks, six are especially noteworthy:

  • Mutual recognition of each other as authentic expressions of the one church of Jesus Christ
  • Mutual recognition of members into one baptism
  • Mutual recognition of ordained ministry
  • Provision for the celebration of the Eucharist together with intentional regularity
  • Intentional commitment to promote unity with wholeness and to oppose all marginalization and exclusion in church and society based on such things as ... sexual orientation.
  • An ongoing process of theological dialogue on continuing issues, especially related to the full reconciliation of ordained ministries.

     As of the 18th Plenary, the nine COCU participating denominations consist of the Episcopal Church, the Presbyterian Church USA, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), the International Council of Community Churches, the United Church of Christ, the United Methodist Church, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church and the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church.
     Not only does the document address the need for unity within the member communions, but it also calls for the Reformed Church in America and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) to join as well. Thus far, both the Reformed Church in America and the ELCA have been classified as COCU "advisory participants." The document says, "We seek dialogues in ever widening circles, including discussions with the Roman Catholic Church, the Orthodox Churches, the churches of the Pentecostal, Holiness and Baptist traditions, and other historic black churches." An official COCU press release added, "Looking to expand the circle of ecumenical and interfaith dialogue, the new entity [Churches Uniting in Christ] will 'seek to be in conversation with representatives of Judaism and Islam and other living faiths."'
     The opening Eucharist service of the COCU Plenary featured a welcome from Roman Catholic Archbishop Justin Regali, calling himself a "friend and fellow servant in Christ." According to a Presbyterian Church USA news release, Regali said he and other Roman Catholic leaders are "real spiritual partners in [COCU's] passage toward unity." The news release said Regali "noted the 'happy coincidence' that the COCU plenary and the papal visit are both taking place around the time of the annual Week of prayer for Christian Unity, which is celebrated each January by Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Protestants and Anglicans." This is another part of the ecumenism that will help bring to pass what the Bible says will surely come, the apostate one-world church.

Return to Index

FORMER SBC PRESIDENT DIALOGUES WITH HOMOSEXUAL DENOMINATION

Jimmy Allen, a former president of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), participated in a dialogue with the renowned Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches (UFMCC), self-described as "the world's largest organization serving the spiritual needs of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community." The meeting marked the UFMCC's 30th anniversary "General Conference and World Jubilee" on July 16, 1999.
     Charisma News Service (CNS), citing a Los Angeles Times article, reported, "The event at the Bonaventure Hotel marked an important transition in lesbian and gay churches' continual efforts to win acceptability among mainline Christians ... Elder Troy Perry, founder and moderator of the Metropolitan Community Church-and former Southern Baptist pastor-said his church has long sought dialogue with other churches. 'We're not going to give up on the Southern Baptists or Pentecostals or evangelical churches,' Perry said" (CNS, 722-99). The CNS report noted that Allen "said the time had come to open a new dialogue that reaches beyond differences in sexuality or theology." He added, "I felt God wanted me to be here ... our theological perspectives are different, but there's something about what God does in the human heart that reaches beyond those differences."
     A July 14, 1999, PR Newswire press release, funded by the UFMCC, stated:

While Rev. Allen disagrees with UFMCC doctrine on the issue of being gay and Christian, he shares much with the 1,500 church leaders attending the conference from 21 countries. Rev. Allen lost a daughter-in-law and two grandsons to AIDS. He will share his experiences of trying to find a Sunday School within his own denomination that would accept his grandchildren. Many Metropolitan Community Churches now offer Sunday School to growing numbers of children with HIV/AIDS and other diseases.

     Allen's daughter-in-law received an AIDS-tainted blood transfusion in 1982 and passed the virus on to her two sons. While his first grandson was still alive, Allen found it difficult across all denominations to find a church that would accept his grandson in their Sunday schools. Prior to the family's losses, even their own church (Disciples of Christ) rejected them, as Allen's son, Scott, was fired from the pastorate. Since then, however, the church has begun an AIDS ministry according to a July 19, 1999, Baptist Press (BP) report.
     In addition to Allen's loss, his other son Skip is gay and HIV-positive. Although adamant in his belief that homosexuality contradicts Biblical morality, Allen said of his son, "I love him, and we do not agree. I believe it's time for us to talk to each other instead of about each other" (BP, 7-16-99). Allen said,

My decision to speak to the Metropolitan Community Churches' conference came on an appeal by [MCC founder] Dr. [Troy] Perry after he had heard me preach to a group of AIDS caregivers. I have stated clearly my beliefs about the issue of God's intention for our sexuality, both in my book, Burden of a Secret, and on platforms across the nation. However, he pointed out to me that many of his people "need to know there are still parents in that [Baptist tradition] who love their children even if they don't agree theologically with them" (BP, 7-19-99).

     Allen served as SBC president from 1977 to 1979 and later presided over the SBC's former Radio and Television Commission. He is also the former pastor of First Baptist Church in San Antonio, Texas. Perry, founder of the UFMCC in 1968, performed the first same-sex marriage in the USA the same year. The UFMCC now totals 42,000 members in 15 countries, of which "over 40% of the mate congregates in many of their churches have died or are living with AIDS, including many of their clergy" (BP, 7-15-99).
     Regardless of the position he takes concerning homosexuality, Allen should have no fellowship with the "unfruitful works of darkness." To "dialogue" and "fellowship" with a denomination that openly boasts of its homosexual, lesbian, bisexual and transgender inclusiveness is completely contrary to the Scriptural command to "avoid" and "depart from" those who teach doctrine other than that which has been given to the church by the apostles. Every believer should love all individuals, regardless of their sins, but no believer should ever dialogue or worship together with those who are blatantly disobeying the Word of God.

Return to Index

GRAHAM CALLS CHRISTIAN ROCK HIS "INTERPRETER" TO TODAY’S YOUTH

     In order to reach out to today's youth, Billy Graham's recent evangelistic crusade in Indianapolis, Indiana, included a Christian rock concert called "Concert for the NeXt Generation" featuring Christian rock groups Anointed (a contemporary soul gospel group), Audio Adrenaline (a Christian alternative punk band) and Michael W. Smith. Both Audio Adrenaline and Michael W. Smith have become widely accepted in the secular music market as well. In a pre-crusade press conference, Graham said he needed an interpreter because today's youth spoke a language he did not understand. "Contemporary Christian music sometimes acts like an interpreter for me, " Graham said (Baptist Press, 69-99). "Although the message remains the same, our methods often must change in order to communicate that message. New tools of outreach and forms of expression must be used," he said. Audio Adrenaline's Mark Stuart told Baptist Press, "We want kids today to see they can have a good time and be a Christian. We put on a real rock n' roll show, but Jesus Christ is our hero, and we try to get kids' eyes off of us and on to Him. " Baptist Press noted that 42,000 youth from various denominations converged upon the RCA Dome to hear the concert. Certainly such worldliness disguised in the form of Christianity is displeasing to a God who has called all believers to be different from the world.

Return to Index

GRAHAM ENCOURAGES ECUMENISM, SHUNS RESPONSIBILITY TO DISTINGUISH TRUTH FROM ERROR

     Dr. Billy Graham's latest evangelistic crusade, held October 14-17, 1999, in St. Louis, MO, sparked yet another monumental ecumenical effort on the part of hundreds of churches and over 70 denominations as they prepared for Graham's third visit this century to the Gateway City. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported that "about 600 churches worked on the crusade project since January. They had full support of their pastors. Another 1000 churches had some members who volunteered as ushers, choir members or counselors, adding that "'the strongest support came from Baptist churches-Graham is an ordained Southern Baptist minister- Presbyterian Church of America congregations and nondenominational churches" (Post-Dispatch, 10-18-99). An October 18, 1999, Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA) press release reported that "many crusade participants and committee members also saw the crusade as an opportunity to build bridges with those of different religious backgrounds" Several churches, including Christ Church Cathedral (Episcopal) and Third Baptist Church (affiliated with both the American Baptist Churches USA and the Southern Baptist Convention) welcomed Graham in a special advertising section of the Post-Dispatch titled "We Welcome the Billy Graham Crusade."
     Prior to every Graham crusade, counselors from many different denominations are trained to provide assistance when "inquirers" come to the platform in response to Graham's altar calls. The Post-Dispatch identified one counselor at the St. Louis crusade as a psychologist and member of St. Michael and St. George Church (Episcopal) in Clayton, MO. The counselors are trained to ask those who come forward whether they have "a preferred church, or a preferred Christian denomination" that can contact them at a later time and invite them to a worship service or a Bible study. Graham's advice concerning finding a church to attend is simply to "go to a church where Christ is preached "He said, "The churches have to do the follow up. Churches must work together to help people follow Jesus' direction to love one another and bring peace to the community" (Post-Dispatch, 10-18-99).
     Believers must understand that long ago Graham decided to distance himself from the Fundamentalist Movement in order to attract a wider following and greater support for his crusades. Dr. William Abraham, professor of church History at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, told the Post-Dispatch that "'the bravest thing' that Graham did was follow his father-in law's lead and work ecumenically with mainline Protestant leaders" He added, initially, Graham was a blue-chip fundamentalist, but after his 1949 crusade in L. A he decided he would break with the fundamentalists" (Post-Dispatch, 10-18-99).
     To this day, Graham's words and actions have proven just how far he has removed himself from adherence to sound doctrine and obedience to the Biblical command of separation from unbelievers and disobedient brethren. Those who desire to earnestly contend for the faith must expose his public statements and actions. While any true believer should be thankful that Graham has kept himself from much of the greed, scandal and public ridicule that has marred the lives and testimonies of so many religious leaders today, such is not an excuse for silence or for accepting anything Graham says or does. The obedient Christian must respond to Graham's public statements and measure his public actions with the Word of God. High moral integrity and an exemplary character do not excuse Graham's unsound doctrinal statements and ecumenical stance.
     Prior to the four-day event, Graham granted an exclusive interview to Post-Dispatch religion writer Patricia Rice, who questioned Graham about, among other things, the "sacrament" of baptism and the growth of evangelical churches. Graham continually emphasized to Rice that his mission from God is only to preach the Gospel, nothing else. After Rice specifically asked Graham, "Do you worry that some never-baptized people who make the altar call will not be baptized? How important is that sacrament to you?" Graham replied:

Baptism is very important because Jesus taught that we are to believe and to be baptized. But that is up to the individual and the church that they feel led to go to. The churches have different teachings on that. I know that in the Lutheran or the Episcopal or Catholic church it is a very strong point, and in the Baptist church. But there are some churches that would not insist on baptism. So, I give them the freedom to teach what they want. I am not a professor. I am not a theologian. I'm a simple proclaimer I'm announcing the news that God loves you and that you can be forgiven of your sins. And you can go to heaven. My job from God is not to do all these other things. (Post-Dispatch, 10-10-99)

     Graham further denounced any other responsibility to God aside from evangelism after Rice asked him what he thought about the recent growth in evangelical churches as opposed to mainline Protestant churches Graham said, I am not a pastor of a church. That's not my responsibility My responsibility is to preach the Gospel to everyone and let them choose their own church, whether it is Catholic or Protestant or Orthodox or whatever it is. And to me that's between an individual and a church and God." Finally, Rice asked Graham what he though about members of Catholic, Protestant or Orthodox churches becoming more evangelistic, to which Graham replied, "I would be encouraged if they become evangelistic. That's the responsibility that Jesus left us, to go to all the world and proclaim the Gospel to every creature. That's evangelism. That is what the Roman Catholic Jesuits did when they came to St. Louis. They were doing evangelism."
     Such statements by Graham are sad indeed He not only refuses to denounce those denominations and churches which preach a false gospel and warn any new believers to beware of false teaching, but he actually encourages inquirers to choose the church and denomination of their choice, whether Roman Catholic, Orthodox, mainline Protestant, Charismatic or non-denominational. In fact, concerning the Roman Catholic Church, the Post-Dispatch said Graham "had a long visit with [Roman Catholic] Archbishop Justin F Rigali and called him a ‘man of God’" (Post-Dispatch, 10-18-99). The aforementioned October 18, 1999, BGEA press release reported that although the Catholic Church did not officially endorse the crusade, "many of its adherents attended the meetings and participated in the year long preparations and volunteer efforts." The press release noted that the "book end" visits of Pope John Paul II in January and Graham in October were "especially significant." It added, "That both communities of faith were stirred significantly during the year-especially in a region of strong Catholic heritage-has brought an increased God consciousness and public expression of faith in the community."
     Every God-honoring believer, whether a pastor, evangelist, teacher or layperson, is required by God to heed all the counsel of God. Such counsel includes, among other things, proclaiming the Good News, living a holy life, heeding and learning sound doctrine and warning other loved ones about the dangers of false doctrine or anything that would hinder their walk with God. Christ commanded the apostles to preach as well as teach (Matthew 28:19,20). Paul commanded Christian leaders to preach, teach and warn, making "full proof of their ministry" (2 Timothy 4 1-5).
     No individual believer receives an exclusive mission from God to only emphasize one aspect of ministry and ignore or even contradict the rest. He cannot "pick and choose" which Scriptural precepts he wants to teach or feels led of God to emphasize. No, the believer is commanded and required to obey the Word of God in all areas of life. Graham, like any other believer, is required to separate from false doctrine, preach the Gospel, warn about that which would hinder another's walk with God and to continue steadfast in sound doctrine. Graham's blatant disregard for all the counsel of God is inexcusable. He certainly knows what God's Word says concerning false gospels and ecumenism. Believers should pray that Graham will change his heart and renounce his ecumenical endeavors.

Return to Index

HINN’S NEW BOOK DETAILS LIFE, INFLUENCE OF KATHRYN KUHLMAN

Benny Hinn's latest book, Kathryn Kuhlman: Her Spiritual Legacy and Its Impact on My Life, documents the tremendous influence Kathryn Kuhlman has left on Hinn's life and ministry. Hinn's book, which contains a forward by Rex Humbard and Oral Roberts (who says he considers Benny Hinn "number one on the field of evangelism today"), details the life of Kuhlman, a Pentecostal evangelist and healer, and provides several pertinent quotes by Kuhlman which give insight into her heretical Pentecostal/Charismatic teachings concerning the Holy Spirit, hearings and miracles. Hinn says the two greatest factors in his early spiritual growth were the Holy Spirit and Kuhlman, for it was Kuhlman who "helped [Hinn] find the anointing." In fact, Hinn says that at the beginning of his ministry, he was "flowing in Kathryn's anointing, not Benny Hinn's. "

Kuhlman ignored the Biblical mandate for male leadership in the church, and she is quoted in the book as once stating, "You can say anything you want about me, as a woman, having no right to stand in the pulpit and preach the Gospel. Yet even if everybody in the world told me that, it would have no effect on me whatsoever." She believed that her "call to the ministry was just as definite as [her] conversion. " Later in the book Hinn quoted her as saying that she never considered herself a woman preacher, but only a few pages later Hinn quotes from her book Glimpse into Glory in which she wrote, "One day I will have preached my last sermon."

Kuhlman's evangelistic meetings were characterized by hearings, testimonies of hearings and individuals becoming "slain in the spirit" to which Hinn noted, "The manifestation of this kind of power was present in every Kathryn Kuhlman service until her ministry ended." Hinn said Kuhlman "did not believe anyone receives a physical healing without also receiving a spiritual healing." She remembered that at times during her services, while people were being healed, others would walk down the aisle and say they wanted to be saved, even though Kuhlman had said, "I have said nothing about salvation or repentance. I have given no altar call. " Kuhlman attributed this to the Holy Spirit, despite the fact that no message of the Gospel had yet been preached in such a situation.

Hinn's book also touches upon the ecumenical nature of Kuhlman's ministry, noting that during one miracle service in Las Vegas in 1975, "ministers from dozens of local churches had their members working and praying for weeks prior to the event. And a priest at one of the largest Roman Catholic churches in the area held a special Mass the day prior to the service. "

Yet he noted that she "came by her ecumenical leanings naturally" due to her denominationally diverse upbringing. "Her rules may have not been understood by some Pentecostals, yet in her meetings were Greek Orthodox, Roman Catholics, people from virtually every Protestant denomination," Hinn said. Kuhlman was adamant that people understand that she never believed God healed one particular way or according to one particular theological system.

She said, "If you believe that I do not acknowledge the sacramental methods of healing used in many different churches, you are under a misapprehension. The power of the Holy Spirit is not confined to any one place or any one system." She advised, and Hinn agrees, that Christians should never become so "dogmatic" in their "thinking, teaching and methods," so as to exclude "other truth of equal importance." Kuhlman detailed how a Roman Catholic nun became "filled with the Spirit" during one of her meetings. Hinn also tells readers that "Pope Paul granted Kuhlman a private audience at the Vatican, lauding her "admirable work"' and gave her a gold medallion.

The last several chapters of the book are full of Scripture that has been pulled out of context in an attempt to justify various Charismatic teachings. Hinn says he believes God speaks to him through dreams today and exhorts his readers to not "be afraid to bring yourself under the shadow of people who are anointed " that is, Charismatics and Pentecostals. While the book primarily emphasizes the positive, uncontroversial aspects of Kuhlman's life and ministry, Hinn does admit that Kuhlman had an affair with a married man, Burroughs Waltrip, and married him soon after he divorced his own wife. Yet several years later, Kuhlman felt that she had to choose between Waltrip and God and divorced Waltrip. Hinn glosses over the Biblical implications of Kuhlman's affair with a married man and her divorce by saying, "In the midst of her growing ministry, legal documents for Kathryn's divorce were filed in 1947, but the topic was irrelevant. She was a new Kathryn and God had buried her past forever."

Return to Index

HUMANISM - MAN WITHOUT GOD

     The teachings of humanism are built on the twin false foundations of deifying man and humanizing God. Religious liberalism leans heavily upon humanistic suppositions, and the compromises of New Evangelicalism have produced a man-centered mindset for ministry in which the false premises of humanism are adopted, knowingly or not. The New Age philosophies dominating the aspirations of religious and secular institutions alike are, again, looking everywhere for answers except to the God of the Bible. One does not have to be officially affiliated with an admittedly humanistic organization to be caught up in the web of humanistic reasoning.
     The Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism issued A Statement of Principles and Values titled "The Affirmations of Humanism." The following excerpts from this humanistic statement constitute direct attacks upon the Bible and the Gospel of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone:

We are committed to the application of reason and science to the understanding of the universe and to the solving of human problems. We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, to seek to explain the world in supernatural terms, and to look outside nature for salvation ... We attempt to transcend divisive parochial loyalties based on race, religion, gender, nationality, creed, class, or ethnicity, and strive to work together for the common good of humanity ... We believe in the cultivation of moral excellence. We respect the right to privacy. Mature adults should be allowed to fulfill their aspirations, to express their sexual preferences, to exercise reproductive freedom, to have access to comprehensive and informed health-care, and to die with dignity.

We believe in the common moral decencies: altruism, integrity, honesty, truthfulness, responsibility. Humanist ethics is amenable to critical, rational guidance. There are normative standards that we discover together. Moral principles are tested by their consequences. ... We are skeptical of untested claims to knowledge, and we are open to novel ideas and seek new departures in our thinking. We affirm humanism as a realistic alternative to theologies of despair and ideologies of violence and as a source of rich personal significance and genuine satisfaction in the service to others. We believe in optimism rather than pessimism, hope rather than despair, learning in the place of dogma, truth instead of ignorance, joy rather than guilt or sin, tolerance in the place of fear, love instead of hatred, compassion over selfishness, beauty instead of ugliness, and reason rather than blind faith or irrationality. We believe in the fullest realization of the best and noblest that we are capable of as human beings.

     Humanism deceives by putting a spin on words and phrases so that their underlying meanings are distorted or negated. Humanism clearly rejects God. True indeed is the Almighty's estimation of all such "filthy dreamers" (Jude 8) "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools... " (Rom. 1: 22).

Return to Index

INTERFAITH ROADS LEADING TO ROME

     Pope John Paul II recently visited the United States following his five-day stay in Mexico. During his 30-hour stop in St. Louis, Missouri, the pope spoke to 20,000 youth during an evening rally, conducted a morning mass for over 100,000 Catholics and led an interfaith prayer service at the Cathedral Basilica of Saint Louis. During his visit, the pope not only expressed his desire for "Christian" unity and for the eventual unity of all religions, but he also declared his complete commitment to interfaith dialogue and cooperation. Upon arriving in St. Louis, the pope said, "I express my friendship and esteem for my fellow Christians, for the Jewish community in America, for our Muslim brothers and sisters. I express my cordial respect for people of all religions and for every person of good will." Certainly every believer should respect all people, regardless of their cultural, racial or religious background. However, the following quotes by the pope and the fact that he called Muslims his "brothers and sisters" reveal that he desires spiritual, ecumenical unity. During the pope's interfaith prayer gathering, which began with the reading of Scripture by Rabbi Robert Jacobs (this was the first time a rabbi had taken part in a papal service anywhere in the world), the pope told his audience:

Our gracious host, Archbishop Rigali, has invited to this Evening Prayer representatives of many different religious groups and sectors of civil society.

I am particularly pleased that distinguished members of other Churches and Ecclesial Communities have joined the Catholic community of St. Louis in this Evening Prayer. With hope and confidence let us continue to work together to realize the Lord's desire: "That they may all be one ... that the world may believe" (Jn. 17:21). My friendship and esteem go also to those of all other religious traditions. In particular I recall my long association with members of the Jewish faith, and my meetings in many parts of the world with my Muslim brothers and sisters. Today, divine Providence has brought us all together and enabled us to pray: "O God, let all the nations praise you !" May this prayer signify our shared commitment to ever greater understanding and cooperation.

     Among those who attended the interfaith meeting was John Anderson, pastor of the Third Baptist Church in St. Louis. According to the New York Times, Anderson is president of the Interfaith Partnership of Metropolitan St. Louis (which includes Christians, Jews, Muslims and Baha'is). In his latest interfaith newsletter, Anderson said: "Instead of marveling at the fact that Providence allows such a great variety of religions, we should be amazed at the number of common elements found within them." Anderson's Third Baptist Church is affiliated with both the Southern Baptist Convention and the American Baptist Churches, U. S. A.
     Prior to his departure, the pope once again reiterated his ecumenical desire: "The welcome extended to me by my fellow Christians and by the members of other religious communities has been most gracious. I hope you will accept my sincere thanks and the assurance of my friendship in the cause of ecumenism and interreligious dialogue and cooperation."
     This same cry for the ecumenical unity of all religions is being reiterated by every interfaith group, including the renowned National Council of Churches and World Council of Churches. The Bible-obeying Fundamentalist should "honor all men," that is, show respect to all men as individuals, but he should not tolerate a false gospel and ecumenical unity at the expense of truth.

Return to Index

JESSE JACKSON’S SOCIAL GOSPEL REJECTS WORK OF CHRIST AS SUFFICIENT FOR SALVATION

     Political activist Jesse Jackson, speaking at Galloway Memorial United Methodist Church in Jackson, Mississippi, told the 1,100 people in attendance that social, political and economic compassion and action must become a reality in their lives in order to get to heaven. An April 20, l999, United Methodist News Service release stated, "Jackson told the crowd the church must lead the way in aiding the least among society. Only then, he said, will Christians meet the criteria Christ established to gain eternal life in heaven." Jackson received a standing ovation at the church, his second stop in his series of meetings throughout the South urging 'hope, healing and racial harmony." Galloway's senior pastor, Sam Morris, said, "It was a great celebration of worship. Anyone in the sanctuary felt the presence of God bringing us together."
     Two problems immediately emerge from Jackson's statements: First, he presents a false gospel to the audience, and second, he completely misunderstands the role of the church in this present age. Jackson twists Scripture in an attempt to justify his social gospel, citing Luke 15:1-7 as society's mandate to "feed the hungry" and aid the poor through welfare programs such as social security and government health care. However, the Word of God says the church is to proclaim the Gospel to all men and to contend for the faith. The mission of the church is to preach and defend God’s Word, not to reform society nor to provide for the material needs of the unsaved. While all believers should possess an attitude of compassion and live peaceably with all men, the focus and mission of the church must remain clear. To distort the mission of the church, and to pervert the Gospel of Jesus Christ, is to propagate "damnable heresy" (2 Pet. 2: 1 ). This is a grave error that only leads the unsaved to an eternity apart from Christ.

Return to Index

LUTHERANS AGREE TO ENTER INTO FULL COMMUNION WITH EPISCOPAL CHURCH

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and the Episcopal Church issued a document entitled "Called to Common Mission" (CCM) which may provide new energy for the ecumenical movement in a new century," according to an Episcopal News Service report (ENS, 8-19-99). With more than the necessary two-thirds majority voting to accept the document, the 5.2 million-member ELCA agreed on August 19, 1999, to enter into full communion with the 2.3 million-member Episcopal Church. The vote means the two denominations would share clergy and sacraments, join in missionary and social service projects and make joint decisions on important issues. George Anderson, presiding bishop of the ELCA, said the vote is "a great step forward in our ecumenical understanding" (Ecumenical News International, 8-20-99). The presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church, Frank T. Griswold, also embraced the decision, adding, "The test of our full communion will be our faithfulness to the Gospel in mission and witness, in prayer and fellowship at God's altar. We ask the Holy Spirit to lead us in the days ahead, to unfold and deepen our relationship" (ENS, 8-19-99).

However, not all Lutherans are excited with this major step in ecumenical history. Some dislike the idea that the ELCA will also accept the "historic episcopate," a belief that Episcopal bishops extend back to Christ's apostles. Catholic and Orthodox churches, as well as Anglican and Episcopalian bodies, hold similar beliefs in a historic episcopate, although each historic line of bishops is different from the other. Lutheran teachings, on the other hand, do not require this succession. Therefore, the CCM document will give Episcopal bishops authority over Lutheran bishops.

Martin E. Marty, a Lutheran pastor and a University of Chicago professor, chaired the document's writing team. Marty indicated that this vote "is the first time in U.S. religious history that a church (ELCA) has bridged the gap between churches so diversely governed-congregational, Presbyterian, synodical, conferencial and episcopal. In light of the new relationships, the Lutheran vote could open the way for other churches to consider the historic episcopate" (ENS, 8-19-99). He predicted that "many new partnerships might lie ahead."

While the Episcopal Church will not vote to accept the document until the summer of 2000 at its next General Convention, the ELCA is already successfully partaking in full communion with Presbyterians, the United Church of Christ and the Reformed Church of America. The same day the ELCA voted to accept the terms of the CCM, it also invited the Moravian Church into its ecumenical fold. United Church of Christ President John Thomas, credited with the successful vote for the ELCA's full communion with the Reformed Church, affirmed the importance of the ELCA's vote to accept the CCM document. "Your future is our future ... To take this step to adopt CCM with integrity would be a sign of your capacity to bring evangelical and catholic and Reformed traditions together, something which has been one of the most difficult issues in the ecumenical movement. If you move forward, you will encourage us to take up these issues again with renewed energy" (ENS, 8-19-99).

Return to Index

"NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER" INVOLVES RIGHT IDEA, WRONG MESSAGE OF COOPERATION

     "What is the National Day of Prayer, and what is its purpose?" is the question posed in the official brochure introducing the National Day of Prayer. "The National Day of Prayer(NDP) is an annual event for Americans of all faiths to take time to pray for our nation and its leaders," the brochure adds. An array of national leaders called upon Americans to pray for their country on May 6, either in their own homes or as part of a larger community event. The NDP Task Force offered promotional information to help individuals organize prayer breakfasts. community rallies and worship services. "People of all faiths are encouraged to participate in the NDP according to their own traditions, " says the brochure. However, official NDP events and promotional materials upheld the Judeo-Christian tradition, organizers said. Mrs. James Dobson served as chairman of the NDP while Mrs. Bill Bright served as co-chairman. Notable religious leaders on the national advisory committee included Bill Bright, Charles Colson, James Dobson and E. V. Hill. National liaisons for the NDP included Rabbi Joshua Haberman, Dr. D. James Kennedy and Father A. Sirico (Roman Catholic).
     While prayer for government leaders is commanded in Scripture, ecumenical prayer with either unbelievers or compromising Christians will never be acceptable in the eyes of God. Likewise, unscriptural prayer in which an individual attempts to "bind evil" or "war against Satan" will not be honored by God since such prayer is not taught in God's Word. Unfortunately, this type of prayer is already being advocated by at least one pastor who used the National Day of Prayer to "engage" the forces of evil. Ted Haggard, renowned pastor of the New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado, told one Christian Times reporter that prayer involves communing with God and confrontation with evil. "Some Christians don't have the courage to confront demonic forces," he said (Christian Times of the Central Coast, Vol. 5, No. 4). The Christian Times article noted, "Haggard says Christians need to "engage" powers of darkness, not merely to pray ‘a mental prayer...a cerebral prayer."' He said prayer is "spirit-to spirit communion and confrontation" (italics added).
     Scripture does not support such teaching, for the Word of God declares that when a believer prays, he is to pray to the Father in the name of the Son as led by the Holy Spirit. Nowhere in Scripture is the believer commanded to "confront evil" through prayer or to "engage" the powers of darkness. The prayer of the believer is to communicate with God, and the lifestyle of the believer is to be lived in accordance with His Word. This obedience to the Word will sufficiently ward off Satan's attacks upon the child of God. Ephesians chapter six provides the Christian with all he needs to "stand against the wiles of the devil," and confrontation with evil powers through prayer (communication with those evil forces) is certainly not included in the text. Beware of both ecumenical concerts of prayer and of those who distort the true purpose and method of prayer.

Return to Index

NEW EDITION OF THE REVISED STANDARD VERSION TO BE EDITED AND EMBRACED BY EVANGELICAL AND CHARISMATIC THEOLOGIANS

     Although a publication date has not yet been released, Crossway Books, a division of Good News Publishers, hopes to publish a new edition of the Revised Standard Version Bible (1971) with input from some of the world's leading Evangelical and Charismatic leaders. The new edition, which Baptist Press (BP) called an "inerrancy-based edition," has been described by one unnamed scholar as "more literal than the New International Version and more readable than the New American Standard Bible." The scholar told BP that the New Testament could be ready within a year (BP, 2-19-99).
     Crossway Books issued a news release on February 17,1999, stating the goal of the new edition:

To reclaim for the Body of Christ the best essentially literal translation of the Bible, which most accurately, clearly, and timelessly communicates the written Word of God, in the words of enduring English ... The English Standard Version will carry forward the classic principles of essentially literal translation, doctrinal accuracy, and literary excellence. As such it will not be a new translation, but rather a new edition of the Bible in the historic stream of translations based on these principles.

     Crossway's news release added that the ESV will be published under a licensing agreement with the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA (NCC) which currently holds the copyright for the Revised Standard Version.
     Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (Louisville, KY) president R. Albert Mohler, Jr., said the scholars working on the English Standard Version represent "conservative scholarship at its best." Mohler told Baptist Press that the English Standard Version "will combine the strengths of an established translation line with the contributions of trusted evangelical scholars." He continued, "The result will be a translation evangelicals will trust."
     So who are the most trusted conservative evangelical scholars? Those on the ESV's 51-member advisory council include: Paige Patterson, president of the Southern Baptist Convention; Carl F. H. Henry, founding editor of Christianity Today; Jerry Falwell, pastor of Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg, VA; R. C. Sproul, director of Ligonier ministries; Edwin W. Lutzer, pastor of Moody Church, Chicago, IL; Jack Hayford, leader in the Charismatic Movement and pastor of The Church on the Way in Van Nuys, CA; Harold O. J. Brown, professor at Reformed Theological Seminary, Charlotte, NC, and signer of the Evangelicals and Catholics Together documents; Todd Hunter, national director of the Association of Vineyard Churches, USA; Don Argue, past president of the National Association of Evangelicals; John F. Walvoord, chancellor of Dallas Theological Seminary; Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School and signer of the Evangelicals and Catholics Together documents.
     Those on the 12-member translation oversight committee include Wayne A. Grudem, chairman of the department of Biblical and systematic theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, IL, and J. I. Packer, professor of theology at Regent University in British Columbia, Canada, and signer of the Evangelicals and Catholics Together documents.
     Two problems immediately emerge with the production of this new edition of the Bible. While this new Bible does claim to be a literal translation that will attempt to correct the liberal slant as found in the Revised Standard Version and its predecessor the American Standard Version(1901), this new edition will not be trustworthy because those involved in its editorial process cannot be trusted, nor is it based on the Greek Received Text (Textus Receptus).
     The men who serve on the advisory and oversight committees represent a mixture of compromised Evangelicals and Charismatics as well as both Reformed and dispensational theologians. Many of these men are certainly not the most trustworthy conservative Evangelical scholars of our day. How can those who join with Roman Catholics in signing the ECT documents and those who teach at compromised seminaries such as Trinity Evangelical Divinity School and those who remain in the Southern Baptist Convention be viewed as the most trustworthy Evangelical theologians? Likewise, why would a staunch dispensational theologian such as John Walvoord become involved as an advisor to this new edition with those who despise his dispensational hermeneutic? Most likely because those involved in the production of this new Bible realize that with Walvoord's name attached (and a few other dispensational theologians), a broader camp would accept this new Bible, for it certainly seems unreasonable for men who interpret the Bible so differently to join together in common cause in the production of a new Bible edition unless such unity would provide a broader acceptance and a more inclusive readership. In addition, Crossway said those holding a position on the translation oversight committee would be required to commit "to the support and use of this new edition of the Bible in their own work and ministry."
     The second noticeable problem with this new Bible is that it is based on the modern critical text following the text of Westcott, Hort and the United Bible Societies rather than the Greek Textus Receptus from which the King James Version is translated. While the ESV claims to be a literal translation, like the King James Version, its underlying text does not represent the preserved Word of God. Crossway noted that in the ESV, "Adaptations will include ... changing 'young woman' to 'virgin' in Isaiah 7:14, and 'expiation' to 'propitiation' in Romans 3:25" to name only a few examples. While these changes are correct, it must be remembered that the English King James Version properly translated the aforementioned words 388 years ago. If Bible-believing, English-speaking Christians would have held fast to the Greek Textus Receptus and the King James Version at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth, no need would exist to "reclaim for the Body of Christ the best essentially literal translation of the Bible, which most accurately, clearly and timelessly communicates the written Word of God, in the words of enduring English," for believers already possess such a translation. Any other translation based on the modern critical text, whether literal or not, cannot be trusted.

Return to Index

NEW INTERFAITH BOOKS FOR CHILDREN PUBLISHED TO EQUIP "TOMORROW'S PEACEMAKERS"

     "Comparative Religion-for Kids" is the headline of a December 11, 1998, Associated Press story contained in the Chicago Tribune. The article describes the efforts of Peggy Fletcher Stack, a religion writer for the Salt Lake Tribune, who discovered a lack of books for grade-school children concerning comparative religions and decided to write a book with the aid of artist Kathleen Peterson. Their 64-page book, A World of Faith, explains the history and beliefs of 28 religions. Within the pages of the book, a child can learn about the history and faith of Roman Catholics, Hindus, Muslims, Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses, to name only a few. The AP story noted that local Muslims were so impressed with Stack's portrayal of their faith that "they declared Allah was with her and invited her to join the faith." The book has been endorsed by Jimmy Carter, Theodore Hesburgh (president emeritus of the University of Notre Dame), Joan Brown Campbell (general secretary of the National Council of Churches) and Paul Kurtz (publisher of Free Inquiry magazine, a publication that unequivocally advances secular humanism). Stack says she wrote the book in order to encourage discussion and dialogue between parents and children. In the preface to her book, she writes, "We hope these pages win show [children] similarities and connectedness so that they can be tomorrow's peacemakers. "
     It is evident that adults are not the sole targets of interfaith ecumenists. Children are now being taught to discover "similarities" between faiths and to recognize a "connectedness" between all religions. Yet the Word of God declares that any other gospel or method of "finding God" is cursed and will only lead one to an eternity apart from Christ. Children must be taught that salvation can only be found through Jesus Christ by faith alone in Him. Believers must reject and oppose any other gospel.

Return to Index

NEW NAE PRESIDENT TO REPLACE "BLOCK WALLS" WITH "PICKET FENCES"

     The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) elected 43-year-old Kevin Mannoia as its new president on March 1 at its annual meeting in Orlando, FL. Mannoia succeeds Don Argue who served since 1995. Mannoia's election comes at a time when the NAE is seeking younger leadership in order to bring vitality to the organization and closer ecumenical ties with Charismatics not affiliated with the NAE as well as individuals within mainline denominations. The NAE's annual meeting included leaders from mainline Protestant denominations including United Methodist theologian Thomas Oden (signer of the Evangelicals and Catholics Together documents) who noted the existence of "real evangelical ecumenism" within the NAE. "This could signal a convergence of the NAE and mainline evangelicals," Oden told Christianity Today (CT 4-5-99).
Mannoia, a bishop in the Free Methodist Church, says he believes it is time for the NAE to include individuals within mainline denominations who embrace more conservative evangelical views. "We have perhaps drawn the circle too close," he said. "We don't need to be looking for litmus tests. We should be replacing block walls with picket fences." For example, Mannoia told CT that United Methodists who did not feel easy with the liberalism embraced by some United Methodist pastors would feel at home in the NAE.
     Mannoia, who attends Cucamonga Christian Fellowship in the Los Angeles area, also desires to bring the NAE into closer fellowship with Charismatics and Pentecostals, including those involved in the Vineyard movement. Christianity Today noted that in his book Church Planting.: The Next Generation, Mannoia says the NAE "need not be fearful of Charismatic movements such as the Vineyard. " In an interview with Ministries Today magazine, Mannoia said he "is comfortable describing himself as a Charismatic because he believes in the gifts of the Holy Spirit." Ministries Today noted that Cucamonga Christian Fellowship "is a progressive, Charismatic-style congregation that has adopted popular worship styles" (MT, May-.June 1999). Mannoia said his goal "is to see Charismatics and non-charismatics-along with black and white evangelicals-work together to build the kingdom of God." " [NAE leaders] recognize that they need change enough to elect someone like me," he told Ministries Today, "but I'm not sure all of them recognize how much that change will cost."
     Mannoia is also striving to further the NAE's involvement in the social gospel. At the NAE annual meeting, he told members, "We have the responsibility for reaching the poor ... reproducing ourselves in new churches ... transforming our culture. Let's go in obedience ... moving into the culture to be his transforming agent" (NAE press release, March 1, 1999). He told one press conference that Evangelicals today must begin to abandon old ways of reaching people with the Gospel. However, he told reporters " he did not know how long it would take to make the changes necessary in the NAE to reach those goals in partnership with churches and denominations across America."
     While 16 years younger than Argue, Mannoia follows in Argue's same ecumenical footsteps. Argue successfully brought the NAE and the National Council of Churches (NCC) closer together during his presidency through dialogue with NCC General Secretary Joan Brown Campbell and the chairman of the Roman Catholic bishop's ecumenical committee, and Mannoia is only serving to further the NAE's ecumenical agenda with the help of the NAE's board. Not only did the NAE board approve of Argue's decision to speak to the NCC's general assembly in 1996 (see Jan-Feb 1998 Foundation), but the board currently embraces the idea that the NAE needs to change or "drift into insignificance." Mannoia has served on the NAE board for the past year.
     The Word of God clearly states that believers are to separate from unbelievers and from those disobedient brethren who tolerate false doctrine. Without question, all mainline Protestant denominations today disseminate false doctrine. By attempting to include individuals from within Charismatic (including Vineyard) churches and mainline Protestant denominations in the ranks of the NAE, the NAE is blatantly rejecting the Biblical doctrine of separation and moving quickly into the hands of religious liberals. While the NAE was originally founded in 1942 to counter religious and political liberalism, it is now a completely compromised organization that desires to place religious, ecumenical unity above truth and sound doctrine.

Return to Index

NEW PLATFORM FOR ECUMENICAL UNITY ESTABLISHED BY CAMPUS CRUSADE, SBC

     New Evangelicals have yet another platform on which they are attempting to forge an unbiblical, ecumenical unity among many denominations: marriage and the family. Campus Crusade for Christ has adopted the Southern Baptist Convention's (SBC) stance on marriage and the family as its own. Dennis Rainy, executive director and co-founder of Campus Crusade's FamilyLife division, made the announcement on July 28, 1999, before 5,000 staff members at Campus Crusade's U.S. Staff Conference in Fort Collins, Colorado. According to Baptist Press, Rainy "believes other denominations and organizations will follow the lead set by the SBC and Campus Crusade" (7-29-99). In the same article Rainy also added that the SBC/Campus Crusade stance is "another example of how the Spirit of God is creating partnerships between denominations, churches, para-church ministries and organizations because of the crisis we're in as a nation. I think we're all realizing that unless we work together we're going to fall apart."
     The original SBC stance on marriage and family was added to the Baptist Faith and Message, SBC's statement of faith, on June 9, 1998, at the SBC annual convention in Salt Lake City, Utah. Called the "Article on the Family," this addition marked the first time since 1963 the denomination has amended its doctrinal statement. Today, this same article marks the first time in Campus Crusade's 48-year history that a statement of this kind has been made other than its own doctrinal statement. Bill Bright, who founded Campus Crusade, and his wife, Vonette, told Baptist Press on July 29, "As a movement, Vonette and I, along with the leadership of Campus Crusade for Christ International, felt it was time to step forward with our friends from the SBC by affirming the Biblical standard for marriage and family."
     This step has the two groups agreeing on Biblical principles such as God's ordination of marriage as foundational to society, marriage being the unity between a man and a woman and the respective roles of each partner–husbands are to love their wives as Christ loves the Church, and women are to graciously" submit to the leadership of their husbands as the Church "willingly" submits to the headship of Christ. However, in addition to the SBC's original four paragraph statement, Campus Crusade added a fifth paragraph which states: "In a marriage lived according to these truths, the love between husband and wife will show itself in listening to each other's viewpoints, valuing each other's gifts, wisdom, and desires, honoring one another in public and in private, and always seeking to bring benefit, not harm, to one another" (BP, 7-29-99).
     Both Bright and the SBC find no harm in uniting with various denominations for a "greater good." Bright, in addition to founding Campus Crusade, is also a cosigner of both of the controversial "Evangelicals and Catholics Together" (EC'I) documents. The signers of these documents confessed their "sins" of rejecting unity in the past and called for an end to proselytizing each other's flocks. As for the SBC, its beliefs about cooperation come from the Baptist Faith and Message which states: "Christian unity in the New Testament sense is spiritual harmony and voluntary cooperation for common ends by various groups of Christ's people. Cooperation is desirable between the various Christian denominations, when the end to be attained is itself justified, and when such cooperation involves no violation of conscience or compromise of loyalty to Christ and His Word as revealed in the New Testament."
     The Campus Crusade/SBC union is not the only ecumenical union that is based on marriage and the family. In May 1999, SBC's LifeWay Christian Resources, FamilyLife and approximately 20 other Protestant, Catholic and para-church groups established the "Covenant Marriage Movement" to encourage couples to remain married for life. Participants in this movement make up a constituency of more than 30 million and include Southern Baptists, Campus Crusade, the Assemblies of God, Focus on the Family, Promise Keepers, Moody Bible Institute, Marriage Savers, the Center for Marriage and Family Studies, Smalley Relationship Center, CrossLife Ministries and FOCCUS, Inc. (Catholic).
     While the SBC's statement on marriage and family is Scriptural, it is unscriptural for Campus Crusade, the SBC or anyone else to use this statement as an impetus for unity with other compromised and even apostate denominations and para-church organizations. Their agreement on a particular issue does not allow them to ignore the fact that they disagree on important Biblical doctrines. God's Word forbids unity at the expense of truth.

Return to Index

POPE CALLS INCREASED DIALOGUE AMONG WORLD RELIGIONS A "SIGN OF HOPE" AT END OF CENTURY

     Pope John Paul II has called upon all religions of the world to join together in an effort to fight poverty and violence during the next millennium. The Associated Press reported that the leader of the world's 900 million Roman Catholics "summoned representatives of the world's religions to the Vatican for one last try during this millennium at cooperation to solve common problems of the world's peoples" (AP, 10-28-99). Representatives from 20 of the world's faiths met at the Vatican during the five day council (October 24-28, 1999) and discussed issues such as religious violence and poverty. During the final day of the Council, the pope denounced religious extremism and the growing gap between the rich and poor nations of the world. The pope, an outspoken foe of economic capitalism, told a crowd of thousands of worshipers in St. Peter's Square, "Surely this is not the way humanity is supposed to live. Is it not therefore right to say that there is indeed a crisis of civilization which can be countered only by a new civilization of love" (Reuters, 10-28-99). Although the pope often referred to the injustices prevalent in the world, he noted that grounds for optimism do exist. "I am convinced that the increased interest in dialogue between religions is one of the signs of hope present in the last part of this century, yet," he said, "there is a need to go further" (Reuters 10-28-99).
     Participants at the interfaith meeting included Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Shintoists, and Baha'is, to name only a few. Representatives from Orthodox, Anglican, Lutheran and evangelical churches attended and participated as well. Joining the pope on the platform during his speech was the Dalai Lama, Tibet's exited spiritual leader. Earlier this year, the Dalai Lama released his book Ethics for the New Millennium in which he stated that religion is not always necessary in the life of an individual. "Whether or not a person is a religious believer does not matter much," he said in his book. "We humans can live quite well without recourse to religious faith."

Return to Index

POPE JOHN PAUL II REJECTS REALITY OF A LITERAL HELL

During his weekly address to the general audience of 8,500 people at the Vatican on July 28, 1999, Pope John Paul II rejected the reality of a physical, literal hell as a place of eternal fire and torment. Rather, the pope said hell is separation, even in this life, from the joyful communion with God. According to an official Vatican transcript of the pope's speech, Pope John Paul II noted that the Scriptural references to hell and the images portrayed by Scripture are only symbolic and figurative of "the complete frustration and emptiness of life without God. " He added, "Rather than a physical place, hell is the state of those who freely and definitively separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy." He said hell is "a condition resulting from attitudes and actions which people adopt in this life." Concerning the concept of eternal damnation, the pope said, "Damnation consists precisely in definitive separation from God, freely chosen by the human person, and confirmed with death that seals his choice for ever." The pope also added, "The thought of hell and even less the improper use of biblical images must not create anxiety or despair." Rather, he stated, it is a reminder of the freedom found in Christ.

The Religion News Service reported that a Vatican-approved editorial published several weeks ago in the Jesuit journal Civilta Cattolica agrees with the pope's latest pronouncement. The editorial explicitly pronounced, "Hell exists, not as a place but as a state, a way of being of the person who suffers the pain of the deprivation of God" (Los Angeles Times, 7-31-99). The pope said eternal damnation is "not God's work but is actually our own doing." Only a week earlier the pope stated that heaven is neither "an abstraction nor a place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship of union with the Holy Trinity. "

Such a statement on hell is strikingly similar to that made by Billy Graham several years ago in which he was quoted,

The only thing I could say for sure is that hell means separation from God. We are separated from his light, from his fellowship. That is going to be hell. When it comes to a literal fire, I don't preach it because I'm not sure about it. When the Scripture uses fire concerning hell, that is possibly an illustration of how terrible it's going to be-not fire but something worse, a thirst for God that cannot be quenched. (Time magazine, 1 1-1 5-93)

Both Graham and now the pope completely reject the clear teaching of Scripture regarding the reality of a literal lake of fire that burns throughout all eternity. The author of Hebrews taught that the reality of hell is a vital Bible doctrine (Heb. 6:1, 2). Jude taught that believers are to contend for the faith (doctrine) once delivered unto the saints and that hell is a real, literal place of fire and torment Jude 3, 7). The apostle Paul taught that those who knew not Christ would suffer the vengeance of God which entailed everlasting damnation (2 Thess. 1:8, 9). The apostle John saw that hell was a real place (Rev. 14: 1 0; 20:10-15; 21:8). And, Jesus Christ Himself taught that hell literally exists, that it lasts forever and that those who reject His perfect salvation would spend eternity therein (Matt. 13:41, 42; 18:8, 9; 25:41-46; Luke 16:19-31). Rejection of the Biblical doctrine of hell by the pope and Graham does not nullify the fact that a literal hell truly exists. "Let God be true, but every man a liar" (Rom. 3:3, 4).

Return to Index

SBC STILL NO PLACE FOR A FUNDAMENTALIST

     While the Southern Baptist Convention is undoubtedly winning several battles against the liberals within the denomination, the SBC is still home to many who refuse to practice Biblical separation from those who teach and preach false doctrine. For example, the SBC allowed Chuck Colson to address the Southern Baptist Pastor's Conference just one day prior to the SBC annual meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. Colson, the driving force behind both Evangelicals and Catholics Together documents and a staunch enemy of Biblical separation, urged SBC pastors to continue fighting the "culture war" despite the call by some within the evangelical camp to refrain from involvement in politics. During the annual meeting, those in attendance also heard National Football League defensive end Reggie White exhort Southern Baptists to work together with all Christians in order to reach out to those in need. A June 17, 1999, Baptist Press report noted, "White said Christians should be 'ashamed of ourselves' for having so many denominations and sects." He added, "Jesus prayed that we might be one in unity, as he and the Father are one. " White emphasized the need for change in the nation's inner-cities and said "change cannot come by just sharing how people can be saved." One event associated with the meeting, the Conference of Associational Directors of Missions, featured mega-church growth expert Rick Warren. Warren spoke on the theme, "Church Planting for a New Century." It is interesting to note that while Warren encourages loud, contemporary music, "positive-only" messages and "seeker-sensitive" programs within the church, SBC President Paige Patterson seemed to criticize such methods in a later message. Patterson told delegates to reject "12-minute sermonettes generated by the 'felt needs' of an assembled cast of postmortem listeners, augmented by drama and multiple repetitions of touchy-touchy, feely-feely music." Patterson said the Word of God Itself should touch people rather than "creative interpretations" of the Bible (Religion Today, 6-17-99). Such duplicity and conflicting ideologies are certainly confusing. Other prominent Southern Baptists attending the annual meeting included John Maxwell, James Merritt and Jerry Falwell, who led the benedictory prayer at one session. The SBC itself still refuses to separate from the liberal, ecumenically-minded Baptist World Alliance (BWA) and the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship (CBF), a group organized by the SBC liberals several years ago. When SBC President Paige Patterson was asked whether or not he thought the denomination should now separate from the CBF, Patterson said, "I don't really know the answer to that question. I'm a Baptist. I am pretty much in favor of folks having the freedom to do whatever they want to do." He added that he hoped, however, that the CBF would honestly state whether or not it is still in agreement with the SBC. It never appeared as though the SBC's affiliation with the BWA was ever in question, for both BWA President Nelson Fanini and General Secretary Denton Lotz spoke during events at the annual meeting. The SBC's affiliation with the BWA and Cooperative Baptist Fellowship means that any SBC church that contributes to the denomination directly supports such liberal organizations.

Return to Index

TORONTO "REVIVAL" NOW BOASTS "DENTAL MIRACLES" FROM GOD

     The Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship Church, home of the "Toronto Blessing Revival," has served as a breeding ground for false doctrine and strange manifestations attributed to the Holy Spirit for many years. Laughing uncontrollably, becoming slain in the Spirit or drunk in the Spirit and barking like dogs and uttering other animal noises have become hallmarks of what is known as the "Toronto Blessing. " Yet now, many at the Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship Church are claiming that God has supernaturally filled their teeth with gold and silver. An official press release by the Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship Church says:

On Wednesday evening March 3rd, 1999 miracles began happening in people's teeth. By Thursday evening, over 50 people were on the platform at Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship testifying to having received what appeared to be gold or bright silver fillings or crowns, which they believe had supernaturally appeared in their mouths after receiving prayer during the Intercession Conference. Many received one, two, three or more, and in some cases up to ten changed fillings! On the Saturday night of the conference, there were l98 on the platform saying that God had given them a dental miracle. By Sunday night, well over 300 people were testifying to this unusual sign.

     The release says those who had experienced this miracle were encouraged to verify the change with their dentists, and some who did approach their dentists "had apparently forgotten that this [previous dental] work had been done." The release continues, "The majority of these incidents however, seem to be beyond explaining, other than that God has given these wonderful gifts. The miracles reportedly continued to happen to family members at home as well as to individuals in other countries throughout the world."
     To attribute these miracles to God is just as ludicrous as attributing holy laughter, spiritual drunkenness or human outbursts of animal noises to the workings of the Lord. Leaders of the Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship provide three reasons as to why God is doing this: "Perhaps because He loves them and delights in blessing His children. Perhaps it is a sign and a wonder to expose the skepticism still in so many of us. Perhaps His glory and presence are drawing very near." However, God only reveals Himself to man through His Word in these last days (Heb. 1: 1-2 cf. Jn. 16:12-14; Eph. 2:19-3:6; 2 Pet. 3:1-2, 15-16). To attribute these acts to God is not only inconsistent with Scripture but contradictory to God’s Word.

Return to Index

TRINITY BROADCASTING NETWORK’S COMPROMISE REAPS FINANCIAL HARVEST

Trinity Broadcasting Network opened its 65,000-square-foot headquarters in Costa Mesa, CA, in May 1998. The multi-million dollar structure houses a programming studio, a bookstore, a theater and what has been described by the Orange County Register as TBN founder Paul Crouch's "8000-square-foot executive suite which occupies half of the top floor of the three-story building" (Register, 6-2-98). The Register, which featured a special report on TBN and its activities, noted that Crouch's executive suite includes a wet bar,